As a software development manager, I've witnessed the growing buzz around generative AI (Gen-AI) tools such as GitHub Copilot. These tools are fundamentally altering the way developers approach their work, but amidst the potential benefits, legitimate concerns exist about the use of these tools – especially free, less controllable platforms like ChatGPT – within company environments.
Let's be realistic: developers are already experimenting with ChatGPT and similar tools. The allure is undeniable – generating code snippets, writing tests, and even brainstorming solutions. This trend isn't going to slow down any time soon. However, pasting sensitive company data into free, external AI systems presents significant risks, including:
Prohibiting developers outright from using Gen-AI tools isn't a realistic or productive approach. Instead, we must provide them with legitimate, company-sanctioned tools. GitHub Co-pilot as an example, if buying for business, will not use your data for training its models. This proactive posture offers several benefits:
Once you embrace legitimate Gen-AI tools, it shouldn't be a leap of faith. There are ways to gauge their impact on your development process. Here are some metrics and approaches to consider:
The software development landscape is rapidly evolving. By embracing the use of legitimate Gen-AI tools and actively measuring their impact, we position our organisations at the forefront of innovation. It's about empowering developers with the right tools while safeguarding the company's intellectual property and upholding security standards.